Timothy Lin
6 July 2017
How do these settlement patterns shape local communities and preferences?
The different consumption and food culture across countries / regions provide an opportunity to test the spillover effects of migrant culture
Observationally there seem to be a link between the popularity of certain types of cuisine and a city’s main migrant group
A substantial amount of work has been done to study the effect of migration on wages(Card 1990; Borjas 2003; S. P. Kerr and Kerr 2011), but analysis on the broader multidimensional effects of migration is more limited
Existing work on cultural diversity tends to focus on its economic value measured through outcomes on wages and housing (Ottaviano and Peri 2006; Bellini et al. 2013) or innovation (W. R. Kerr and Lincoln 2010; Hunt and Gauthier-Loiselle 2010)
Related to Bronnenberg, Dubé, and Gentzkow (2012) who show that the preferences of interstate migrants within the US over consumer packaged goods converge slowly to native preferences
This paper extends the literature on the economics of migration and culture by studying a new outcome measure (household food consumption)
Methodologically, this papwe applies text classification methods on the product attributes field of the Nielsen consumer panel dataset to construct a measure of foreign-linked expenditure
CES, Dixit and Stiglitz (1977) type model
\[ \begin{align} U_{i} & = C^{\alpha_{i}}_{i}F^{1-\alpha_{i}}_{i} \\ F_{i} &= \left( \sum_{j=1}^{N} \beta_j^{\frac{1}{\sigma}} x_j^{\frac{\sigma -1 }{\sigma}} \right) ^\frac{\sigma}{\sigma - 1} \end{align} \] Relative demand: \[ \frac{x_j}{x_k} = \frac{\beta_j}{\beta_k} \left( \frac{p_k}{p_j} \right)^\sigma \]
Summing over all products we obtain: \[ m = \sum_{j=1}^{N} p_j x_j = \left( \sum_{j=1}^{N} \frac{\beta_j}{\beta_k} p_j^{1-\sigma}\right) p_k^\sigma x_k \]
Marshallian demand: \[
\begin{align}
x_k &= \frac{m p_k^{-\sigma}}{\sum_{j=1}^{N} \frac{\beta_j}{\beta_k}p_j^{1-\sigma}} \\
&= \frac{\beta_k m}{p_k^\sigma} \left( \sum_{j=1}^{N} \beta_j p_j^{1-\sigma} \right)^{-1} \\
&= \frac{\beta_k m}{P} \left( \frac{P}{p_k}\right)^\sigma
\end{align}
\] Expenditure share: \[
s_j = \beta_j \left( \frac{P}{p_j}\right)^{\sigma-1}
\]
Holding price constant, an increase in \(\beta\) increases the associated expenditure share.
Assume single product firms engaging in Bertrand price competition
Profit function:
\[ \pi_i = p_i x_i - c_i x_i - F_i \]
F.O.C
\[ \begin{align} 0 &= x_i + p_i \frac{\partial x_i}{\partial p_i} - c_i \frac{\partial x_i}{\partial p_i} \\ c_i &= \left( 1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon_d}\right)p_i \\ &= \left( 1 - \frac{1}{\sigma}\right)p_i \end{align} \]
Product \(i\) is imported if profit is higher than fixed cost
\[ (p_i - c_i)x_i \geq F_i \]
Equilibrium (assuming identical consumers):
\[ \frac{F_i}{p_i -c} = \frac{\beta_i m}{P} \left( \frac{P}{p_i}\right)^\sigma \]
Challenges in identifying changes in consumer’s preferences:
Variety of goods is endogenous
Hard to distinguish between preference and cost channels
Nevertheless, an increase in migrant flow is theorised to lead to an increase in consumption share
65,600 unique UPC codes in the initial dataset
Merged UPC codes to type description and product description fields depending on which provide more information to create a vector of search text
Excluded the following categories: misc. sauces, sandwich spreads meat, extracts, vegetables onion instant, multipack, soup
Product description fields are quite sparse and contain basic information on product characteristic / flavour e.g. “mahi mahi mango marinaded”, “fajita seasoning”, “beans”
Search text is subsequently merged with the TF-IDF dataset to create geographical region weights for 47,000 UPC codes
Search text is merged to two versions of the recipe TF-IDF scores, single word and word pairs
The word pair score is used if such a merge exists, otherwise the single word match with the highest maximum score is used e.g. “fajita seasoning” would be given the TF-IDF score of “fajita seasoning” if it exists, else it would be assigned the maximum of “fajita” and “seasoning”
Implemented a bag-of-words model commonly used in document classification problems
Similar studies using text classification include Antweiler and Frank (2004) and Gentzkow and Shapiro (2010)
\[ TF\text{-}IDF_{t,d} =\frac{f_{t,d}}{\sum_{t'\in d}f_{t',d}} \cdot log \frac{N}{n_{t}+1} \]
where \(f_{t,d}\) is the frequency in which term \(t\) appears in document \(d\)
\(N\) is the total number of documents in the corpus and \(n_{t}\) is the total number of documents where term \(t\) is found
The TF-IDF approach is commonly used in document classification problems and usually out performs multinomial naive bayes (Kibriya et al. 2004)
\[ Exp\_share_{ij} = \rho FB\_share_{ij} + \mu ln\_dist_{ij} + \lambda_{i} + \gamma_{j} +\epsilon_{ij} \]
Control for unobserved variation at the county(\(i\)) and geographical-region(\(j\)) level as well as log great circle distance between county and region.
Omitted variable problem not a main concern. While many factors affect foreign-born share, few, if any are correlated with local food expenditure share
Potential “peer effects” endogeneity concerns(Angrist 2014) e.g. similar preferences between parent and child of common ancestry
Solution: restrict the foreign-born share sample to non-European countries
Measurement error is still a large source of concern
Use 1980 foreign-born share as an instrument
Foreign enclave idea (Card 2001; Ottaviano and Peri 2006). Exploit persistent migrant flow patterns that are plausibly orthogonal to consumption
Furthermore, the time period also coincides with the liberalisation of U.S. migration policy
The Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965 replaced the national origins quota with a category system
Distribution of the initial wave of migrant plausibly exogenous to consumption
Policy change resulted in mass migration primarily from Central America and Asia (Chiswick and Hatton 2003; Abramitzky and Boustan 2016)
Dependent variable: | ||||||
Exp Share | ||||||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
2010 FB Share | 0.1619*** | 0.0011 | 0.3312 | 0.0791 | 0.1764*** | -0.0490 |
(0.0558) | (0.0174) | (0.2501) | (0.1480) | (0.0593) | (0.0365) | |
Sample | Full | Asia | Full | Asia | Full | Asia |
Geographical region FE | X | X | X | X | ||
County FE | X | X | X | X | ||
Observations | 796,448 | 448,002 | 796,448 | 448,002 | 796,448 | 448,002 |
Notes: Two-way standard errors clustered by county and geographical region in parentheses. | ||||||
Full sample consists of 18 regions, Asia sample consists of 9 regions. | ||||||
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01 |
Dependent variable: | ||||||
Exp Share | 2010 FB Share | Exp Share | 2010 FB Share | Exp Share | ||
OLS | OLS Subset | First Stage | IV | First Stage | IV | |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
2010 FB Share | 0.1764*** | 0.2004*** | ||||
(0.0593) | (0.0426) | |||||
1980 FB Share | 1.8307*** | 2.1091*** | ||||
(0.1778) | (0.2753) | |||||
Fitted 2010 FB Share | 0.2762*** | -0.1337** | ||||
(0.0480) | (0.0669) | |||||
First Stage F-stat | 105.99 | 58.71 | ||||
Sample | Full | Full | Full | Full | Asia | Asia |
Geographical region FE | X | X | X | X | X | X |
County FE | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Observations | 796,448 | 595,920 | 595,932 | 595,920 | 248,305 | 248,300 |
Notes: Two-way standard errors clustered by county and geographical region in parentheses. | ||||||
OLS Full sample consists of 18 regions, OLS Subset and IV Full sample consists of 12 regions, IV Asia sample consists of 5 regions. | ||||||
The decrease in the number of observations in the IV sample is due to data availability limitations of the 1980 NHGIS dataset. | ||||||
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01 |
Dependent variable: | ||||||||
Category Exp Share | ||||||||
IV | IV | IV | IV | IV | IV | IV | IV | |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
Fitted 2010 FB Share | 0.3246*** | -0.0835*** | 0.5860*** | -0.2106 | 0.1438 | -0.1101** | 0.0029 | 0.0205*** |
(0.0559) | (0.0322) | (0.1748) | (0.2660) | (0.1364) | (0.0482) | (0.0204) | (0.0026) | |
Sample | Full | Asia | Full | Asia | Full | Asia | Full | Asia |
Product category | Frozen | Frozen | Ready-to-serve | Ready-to-serve | Sauces | Sauces | Spice | Spice |
Geographical region FE | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
County FE | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Observations | 564,672 | 235,280 | 557,076 | 232,115 | 586,908 | 244,545 | 539,172 | 224,655 |
Notes: Two-way standard errors clustered by county and geographical region in parentheses. | ||||||||
IV Full sample consists of 12 regions, IV Asia sample consists of 5 regions. | ||||||||
The decrease in the number of observations in the IV sample is due to data availability limitations of the 1980 NHGIS dataset. | ||||||||
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01 |
Dependent variable: | ||||||
Exp Share | Exp Share | Exp Share | ||||
IV | IV | IV | IV | IV | IV | |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
Fitted 2010 FB Share | 0.2762*** | -0.1337** | 0.2854*** | -0.1165 | 0.2818*** | -0.1457** |
(0.0480) | (0.0669) | (0.0484) | (0.0884) | (0.0527) | (0.0593) | |
Sample | Full | Asia | Full | Asia | Full | Asia |
Expenditure measure | Wtd. Avg | Wtd. Avg | Majority | Majority | High Majority | High Majority |
Geographical region FE | X | X | X | X | X | X |
County FE | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Observations | 595,920 | 248,300 | 595,920 | 248,300 | 595,920 | 248,300 |
Notes: Two-way standard errors clustered by county and geographical region in parentheses. | ||||||
IV Full sample consists of 12 regions, IV Asia sample consists of 5 regions. | ||||||
Expenditure measure constructed by weighted average (Wtd. Avg) or with weight=1 for the region with highest weight (Majority) | ||||||
or with weight=1 for the region with highest weight conditional on the initial weight being greater than 0.5 (High Majority) | ||||||
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01 |
Dependent variable: | ||||||
Exp Share | ||||||
IV | IV | IV | IV | IV | IV | |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
Fitted 2010 FB Share | 0.5892*** | -0.3225** | 0.5320* | -0.4156*** | 0.9673** | 0.2032 |
(0.1372) | (0.1418) | (0.2774) | (0.1196) | (0.3940) | (0.3453) | |
Sample | Full | Asia | Full | Asia | Full | Asia |
Dataset used | NHGIS 1980 | NHGIS 1980 | IPUMS 1970 | IPUMS 1970 | NHGIS 1970 | NHGIS 1970 |
Geographical region FE | X | X | X | X | X | X |
County FE | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Observations | 595,920 | 248,300 | 202,244 | 101,122 | 496,550 | 148,965 |
Notes: Two-way standard errors clustered by county and geograpical region in parentheses. | ||||||
Baseline NHGIS 1980 IV Full sample consists of 12 regions, IV Asia sample consists of 5 regions. | ||||||
IPUMS 1970 IV Full sample consists of 14 regions, IV Asia sample consists of 7 regions. | ||||||
NHGIS 1970 IV Full sample consists of 10 regions, IV Asia sample consists of 3 regions. | ||||||
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01 |
Dependent variable: | ||||
Exp Share | ||||
OLS | OLS | IV | IV | |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
2010 FB Share | 0.1756*** | -0.0549 | ||
(0.0589) | (0.0373) | |||
Foreign Dis x 2010 FB Share | -0.0322 | |||
(0.0408) | ||||
Asia Dis x 2010 FB Share | -0.0130 | |||
(0.0599) | ||||
Fitted 2010 FB Share | 0.2748*** | -0.2170* | ||
(0.0492) | (0.1179) | |||
Fitted Foreign Dis x 2010 FB Share | -0.0126 | |||
(0.0744) | ||||
Fitted Asia Dis x 2010 FB Share | -0.1494 | |||
(0.1499) | ||||
Sample | Full | Asia | Full | Asia |
Geographical region FE | X | X | X | X |
County FE | X | X | X | X |
Observations | 796,256 | 444,537 | 595,776 | 246,375 |
Notes: Two-way standard errors clustered by county and geographical region in parentheses. | ||||
OLS Full sample consists of 18 regions, IV Full sample consists of 12 regions, IV Asia sample consists of 5 regions. | ||||
The decrease in the number of observations in the IV sample is due to data availability limitations of the 1980 NHGIS dataset. | ||||
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01 |
Dependent variable: | ||||
Exp Share | ||||
IV | IV | IV | IV | |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
Fitted 2010 FB Share | 0.2342*** | 0.3086*** | -0.1619 | -0.1218* |
(0.0498) | (0.0531) | (0.1006) | (0.0712) | |
Sample | Full, Young | Full, Old | Asia, Young | Asia, Old |
Geographical region FE | X | X | X | X |
County FE | X | X | X | X |
Observations | 121,404 | 474,516 | 50,585 | 197,715 |
Notes: Two-way standard errors clustered by county and geographical region in parentheses. | ||||
IV Full sample consists of 12 regions, IV Asia sample consists of 5 regions. | ||||
The decrease in the number of observations in the IV sample is due to data availability limitations of the 1980 NHGIS dataset. | ||||
Young refers to households where the age of male or female head of household is below 45. Old is the complement group. | ||||
*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01 |
The greater the number of Asian migrants to a particular county, the less likely it is for a native to purchase related supermarket goods
By contrast, there is a positive relationship between non-Asian migrantion and consumption share
These results are consistent across OLS and IV specifications and are robust to various methods of constructing expenditure shares and regional aggregations
The positive relationship between share of foreign born of non-Asian origin and local expenditure may be due to the peer effect endogeneity problem
Potential violation of the exclusion restriction: the recent migration wave also significantly expanded the availability and quality of outside food options
Cross-substitution patterns could result in households substituting home-cooked food for outside consumption or perhaps there is a higher standard of what constitutes authentic Asian food and supermarket produce may not make the standard
Africa | Caribbean | Central_America | China | Eastern_Europe | France | Germany | Greece | India | Italy | Japan | Korea | Middle_East | Other_Southeast_Asia | Philippines | Scandinavia | South_America | Spain | Thailand | Vietnam | |
Africa | 1 | 0.903 | 0.733 | 0.671 | 0.725 | 0.750 | 0.629 | 0.813 | 0.842 | 0.712 | 0.639 | 0.682 | 0.897 | 0.761 | 0.842 | 0.431 | 0.910 | 0.862 | 0.607 | 0.587 |
Caribbean | 0.903 | 1 | 0.760 | 0.695 | 0.688 | 0.733 | 0.598 | 0.827 | 0.810 | 0.700 | 0.700 | 0.724 | 0.859 | 0.803 | 0.876 | 0.407 | 0.912 | 0.873 | 0.757 | 0.706 |
Central_America | 0.733 | 0.760 | 1 | 0.555 | 0.576 | 0.638 | 0.457 | 0.693 | 0.734 | 0.705 | 0.540 | 0.558 | 0.658 | 0.623 | 0.692 | 0.308 | 0.729 | 0.655 | 0.603 | 0.623 |
China | 0.671 | 0.695 | 0.555 | 1 | 0.539 | 0.582 | 0.496 | 0.552 | 0.649 | 0.539 | 0.837 | 0.820 | 0.663 | 0.801 | 0.808 | 0.358 | 0.671 | 0.643 | 0.752 | 0.780 |
Eastern_Europe | 0.725 | 0.688 | 0.576 | 0.539 | 1 | 0.874 | 0.920 | 0.632 | 0.605 | 0.579 | 0.628 | 0.481 | 0.695 | 0.565 | 0.707 | 0.861 | 0.797 | 0.612 | 0.469 | 0.502 |
France | 0.750 | 0.733 | 0.638 | 0.582 | 0.874 | 1 | 0.817 | 0.719 | 0.622 | 0.726 | 0.583 | 0.539 | 0.741 | 0.623 | 0.707 | 0.756 | 0.822 | 0.685 | 0.559 | 0.577 |
Germany | 0.629 | 0.598 | 0.457 | 0.496 | 0.920 | 0.817 | 1 | 0.531 | 0.499 | 0.456 | 0.592 | 0.469 | 0.605 | 0.524 | 0.630 | 0.930 | 0.713 | 0.503 | 0.425 | 0.462 |
Greece | 0.813 | 0.827 | 0.693 | 0.552 | 0.632 | 0.719 | 0.531 | 1 | 0.638 | 0.796 | 0.559 | 0.572 | 0.822 | 0.654 | 0.733 | 0.371 | 0.808 | 0.829 | 0.578 | 0.590 |
India | 0.842 | 0.810 | 0.734 | 0.649 | 0.605 | 0.622 | 0.499 | 0.638 | 1 | 0.623 | 0.571 | 0.615 | 0.791 | 0.781 | 0.740 | 0.329 | 0.785 | 0.703 | 0.646 | 0.588 |
Italy | 0.712 | 0.700 | 0.705 | 0.539 | 0.579 | 0.726 | 0.456 | 0.796 | 0.623 | 1 | 0.503 | 0.535 | 0.698 | 0.592 | 0.668 | 0.334 | 0.740 | 0.684 | 0.518 | 0.608 |
Japan | 0.639 | 0.700 | 0.540 | 0.837 | 0.628 | 0.583 | 0.592 | 0.559 | 0.571 | 0.503 | 1 | 0.814 | 0.608 | 0.769 | 0.784 | 0.482 | 0.639 | 0.647 | 0.731 | 0.736 |
Korea | 0.682 | 0.724 | 0.558 | 0.820 | 0.481 | 0.539 | 0.469 | 0.572 | 0.615 | 0.535 | 0.814 | 1 | 0.653 | 0.738 | 0.778 | 0.331 | 0.717 | 0.747 | 0.701 | 0.721 |
Middle_East | 0.897 | 0.859 | 0.658 | 0.663 | 0.695 | 0.741 | 0.605 | 0.822 | 0.791 | 0.698 | 0.608 | 0.653 | 1 | 0.717 | 0.811 | 0.415 | 0.869 | 0.868 | 0.606 | 0.625 |
Other_Southeast_Asia | 0.761 | 0.803 | 0.623 | 0.801 | 0.565 | 0.623 | 0.524 | 0.654 | 0.781 | 0.592 | 0.769 | 0.738 | 0.717 | 1 | 0.850 | 0.371 | 0.764 | 0.697 | 0.809 | 0.750 |
Philippines | 0.842 | 0.876 | 0.692 | 0.808 | 0.707 | 0.707 | 0.630 | 0.733 | 0.740 | 0.668 | 0.784 | 0.778 | 0.811 | 0.850 | 1 | 0.456 | 0.865 | 0.782 | 0.759 | 0.738 |
Scandinavia | 0.431 | 0.407 | 0.308 | 0.358 | 0.861 | 0.756 | 0.930 | 0.371 | 0.329 | 0.334 | 0.482 | 0.331 | 0.415 | 0.371 | 0.456 | 1 | 0.548 | 0.298 | 0.304 | 0.349 |
South_America | 0.910 | 0.912 | 0.729 | 0.671 | 0.797 | 0.822 | 0.713 | 0.808 | 0.785 | 0.740 | 0.639 | 0.717 | 0.869 | 0.764 | 0.865 | 0.548 | 1 | 0.840 | 0.656 | 0.624 |
Spain | 0.862 | 0.873 | 0.655 | 0.643 | 0.612 | 0.685 | 0.503 | 0.829 | 0.703 | 0.684 | 0.647 | 0.747 | 0.868 | 0.697 | 0.782 | 0.298 | 0.840 | 1 | 0.611 | 0.574 |
Thailand | 0.607 | 0.757 | 0.603 | 0.752 | 0.469 | 0.559 | 0.425 | 0.578 | 0.646 | 0.518 | 0.731 | 0.701 | 0.606 | 0.809 | 0.759 | 0.304 | 0.656 | 0.611 | 1 | 0.839 |
Vietnam | 0.587 | 0.706 | 0.623 | 0.780 | 0.502 | 0.577 | 0.462 | 0.590 | 0.588 | 0.608 | 0.736 | 0.721 | 0.625 | 0.750 | 0.738 | 0.349 | 0.624 | 0.574 | 0.839 | 1 |
N | Mean | SD | Min | Q25 | Median | Q75 | Max | |
household_total_exp | 50,123 | 328.91 | 236.16 | 0 | 164.03 | 277.84 | 435.17 | 4,948 |
Africa | 50,120 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.47 |
Caribbean | 50,120 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.54 |
Central_America | 50,120 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 1 |
China | 50,120 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.53 |
Eastern_Europe | 50,120 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.59 |
France | 50,120 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.60 |
Germany | 50,120 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.47 |
Greece | 50,120 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.30 |
India | 50,120 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.54 |
Italy | 50,120 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.96 |
Japan | 50,120 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.74 |
Korea | 50,120 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.56 |
Middle_East | 50,120 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.53 |
Other_Southeast_Asia | 50,120 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.003 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.37 |
Philippines | 50,120 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.34 |
Scandinavia | 50,120 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.38 |
South_America | 50,120 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.42 |
Spain | 50,120 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.50 |
Thailand | 50,120 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.92 |
Vietnam | 50,120 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.01 | 0.41 |
Top products by weight | Africa | Caribbean | Central_America | China | Eastern_Europe | France | Germany | Greece | India | Italy | Japan | Korea | Middle_East | Other_Southeast_Asia | Philippines | Scandinavia | South_America | Spain | Thailand | Vietnam |
Score < = 1 | mild moroccan fish | navy bean | pinto bean | spicy kung bowl | beef cholent kugel kishka | watermelon rind | buttery rice | rotini tomato basil | kidney bean | gnocchi potato | sushi wrap rice bowl | barbecued beef pork | bean rice | peanut satay sauce | beef steak pepper | swedish cream | peruvian bean | spanish style rice | thailand fragrant rice | dragon roll |
roasted split turkey breast | baked navy bean | chile tamale | spicy mongolian bowl | string bean | chestnut puree | assorted | grape leaves | rice pilaf | manicotti | umeboshi plum | braised beef chili | pinto bean rice | satay sauce | beef steak dinner | rock roll berry roll | vino seco wine | pork brains canned | fragrant rice | dragon sauce | |
spicy moroccan fish | aromatic | cheesy hashbrown | spicy szechuan ramen | string bean potato | gratin potato | sausage hash canned | beef burger stew | madras lentils | gnocchi | sushi ocean crab roll | miso soybean paste | savory bean rice | chile pepper | supreme sushi piece | rutabaga | white vino seco wine | canary bean | buffalo style | vietnamese noodle | |
Score < =0.5 | yellow rice | butterflied shrimp | chilies | hoisin sauce | roast duck sauce | herbs | chervil flakes | macaroni | cayenne | vermouth wine | broiled steak seasoning | rice soup powder | mughlai kofta rice | mild navratan kurma | shrimp spring roll | raisin gcmgbl medley | santa style beef | lobster rangoon | tiger sauce | spicy grass chili rice |
regular yellow rice | island getaway seasoning | rotisserie oven roast seasoning | miso hoisin sauce | smoked bacon | spice herbs | chervil leaves | elbow macaroni | chili cayenne powder | beef portobello | flame broiled cheese beef | pork napa cabbage dumpling | white beans | mild potato spinach rice | spring roll | raisin crispies | mongolian style beef | seafood shrimp lobster newberg sauce fillo | tiger seasoning | grass rice | |
lamb stew | shrimp island lime | oven chicken glaze | rakkyo scallion | sour cream chive potato | salad herbs | chervil | shell macaroni | mini whole grain pasta | roast beef gravy | flame broiled fajita chicken | seasoned rotisserie | great northern white beans | mild cstnb | spring roll wrap | country style dijon mustard | style beef | lobster cake maine | sticky rice | chix noodle soup | |
Abramitzky, Ran, and Leah Platt Boustan. 2016. “Immigration in American Economic History.” Journal of Economic Literature (Forthcoming).
Angrist, Joshua D. 2014. “The Perils of Peer Effects.” Labour Economics 30. Elsevier: 98–108.
Antweiler, Werner, and Murray Z Frank. 2004. “Is All That Talk Just Noise? The Information Content of Internet Stock Message Boards.” The Journal of Finance 59 (3). Wiley Online Library: 1259–94.
Bellini, Elena, Gianmarco IP Ottaviano, Dino Pinelli, and Giovanni Prarolo. 2013. “Cultural Diversity and Economic Performance: Evidence from European Regions.” In Geography, Institutions and Regional Economic Performance, 121–41. Springer.
Borjas, George J. 2003. “The Labor Demand Curve Is Downward Sloping: Reexamining the Impact of Immigration on the Labor Market.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4). Oxford University Press: 1335–74.
Bronnenberg, Bart J., Jean-Pierre H. Dubé, and Matthew Gentzkow. 2012. “The Evolution of Brand Preferences: Evidence from Consumer Migration.” The American Economic Review 102 (6). American Economic Association: 2472–2508.
Card, David. 1990. “The Impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami Labor Market.” ILR Review 43 (2). SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: 245–57.
———. 2001. “Immigrant Inflows, Native Outflows, and the Local Labor Market Impacts of Higher Immigration.” Journal of Labor Economics 19 (1). The University of Chicago Press: 22–64.
Chiswick, Barry, and Timothy J. Hatton. 2003. “International Migration and the Integration of Labor Markets.” In Globalization in Historical Perspective, edited by Michael D. Bordo, Alan M. Taylor, and Jeffrey G. Williamson, 65–120. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dixit, Avinash K, and Joseph E Stiglitz. 1977. “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity.” The American Economic Review 67 (3). JSTOR: 297–308.
Gentzkow, Matthew, and Jesse M Shapiro. 2010. “What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from Us Daily Newspapers.” Econometrica 78 (1). Wiley Online Library: 35–71.
Hunt, Jennifer, and Marjolaine Gauthier-Loiselle. 2010. “How Much Does Immigration Boost Innovation?” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2 (2). American Economic Association: 31–56.
Kerr, Sari Pekkala, and William R. Kerr. 2011. “Economic Impacts of Immigration: A Survey.” NBER Working Papers 16736. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/16736.html.
Kerr, William R, and William F Lincoln. 2010. “The Supply Side of Innovation: H-1B Visa Reforms and Us Ethnic Invention.” Journal of Labor Economics 28 (3). The University of Chicago Press: 473–508.
Kibriya, Ashraf M, Eibe Frank, Bernhard Pfahringer, and Geoffrey Holmes. 2004. “Multinomial Naive Bayes for Text Categorization Revisited.” In Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 3339:488–99. Springer.
Ottaviano, Gianmarco IP, and Giovanni Peri. 2006. “The Economic Value of Cultural Diversity: Evidence from Us Cities.” Journal of Economic Geography 6 (1). Oxford Univ Press: 9–44.